Skip to content
Statistics

Volunteer Recognition Report (2026): Participation, Value, Retention and the Appreciation Gap

VolunteerBadge Team·November 3, 2026·9 min read

Volunteer recognition statistics for 2026: national volunteering rates, the $36.14 hour value, retention data, and the appreciation gap nonprofits can close.

Screen for $5

FCRA-compliant volunteer background checks. No monthly fees.

Recognition is one of the cheapest levers a nonprofit or congregation has for keeping volunteers, yet many programs still treat thank-you notes as an afterthought. This report pulls together the latest national data on who volunteers, what that time is worth, how felt respect relates to whether people keep serving, and where the recognition gap is widest. It is part of our statistics hub on volunteer retention, and it is written for nonprofit and church leaders who need figures they can defend in a board packet or grant report.

Methodology and honesty note. Every statistic here was taken from a source we located and linked. Most national figures come from federal or university research (AmeriCorps with the U.S. Census Bureau, Independent Sector with the University of Maryland's Do Good Institute). Where a number comes from a survey of a single country, a single organization, or a vendor, we say so in the text. Commonly repeated benchmarks that we could not trace to a primary study are labeled as such or left out. Because survey years differ, we always state the year. This is a living report and will be refreshed each year.

Key takeaways

75.7MAmericans who formally volunteered through an organization in 2023
$36.14Independent Sector's 2025 estimated value of one volunteer hour
15%Turnover among Indiana Scouting volunteers who got no award, versus 6% for those who did
46.2%Volunteer retention among people who felt "not at all" respected, in a 20-year national study

Who volunteers now

Volunteering has rebounded from its pandemic low. AmeriCorps reports that more than 28 percent of Americans, or more than 75.7 million people, formally volunteered between September 2022 and 2023, contributing an estimated 4.99 billion hours with an economic value of $167.2 billion. The national formal rate had fallen to 23.2 percent in 2021, which the agency's earlier research summary put down from 30 percent in 2019. Informal helping is even more widespread: more than 54 percent of Americans helped neighbors outside any organization in the same period, according to AmeriCorps' 2023 release.

28.3%
54.2%
Formal and informal participation, 2023. Source: AmeriCorps

The formal rate has not fully returned to pre-pandemic levels. The chart below compares national formal volunteering rates across three survey waves.

201930%
202123%
202328.3%
National formal volunteering rate by survey year. Sources: AmeriCorps 2021 summary; AmeriCorps 2023 data

Participation also varies sharply by state. In the 2023 data, AmeriCorps' state trend tables show Utah leading at 46.6 percent, with Vermont next at 40.5 percent. The same release counted over 13.4 million people who volunteered virtually or in a hybrid format, averaging 95 hours, which means the in-person majority still carries most of the load. Programs that want to run checks on a growing roster should plan for that scale, not for the pandemic-era dip.

What volunteer time is worth

Recognition conversations often start with money. Independent Sector and the Do Good Institute estimate the value of a volunteer hour at $36.14 for 2025, a 3.9 percent increase over 2024. The estimate uses average hourly earnings data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the organization notes that it is a replacement-cost estimate, not a precise price for each role. The prior-year figure was $34.79 per hour.

For a congregation or nonprofit reporting annual impact, that means 1,000 volunteer hours represent roughly $36,140 in in-kind value at the national rate. Use state-level rates where funders ask for them, and pair the dollar figure with stories and retention data so the number does not stand alone. The NonProfit PRO summary of the 2026 report notes that the estimate was published during National Volunteer Week.

The recognition gap

Recognition is widely felt to matter, but it is not consistently delivered. In the workplace, Gallup found that only one in three U.S. workers strongly agreed they had received recognition or praise for good work in the previous seven days. Among volunteers, the picture is more mixed. In England, NCVO's Time Well Spent survey found that 84 percent of volunteers felt recognized enough for their volunteering, yet 23 percent believed people did not want recognition at all. That second figure is a useful warning: many leaders assume volunteers do not want thanks, and some volunteers quietly agree.

84%
80%
Two England-based volunteer measures. Source: NCVO Time Well Spent

Recognition and retention

Felt respect is one of the clearer predictors of whether volunteers return. A national study of 2,677 volunteers from the Midlife in the United States study found that people who felt more respect for their volunteer work were more likely to keep volunteering across 20 years. In the later wave, retention ran from 75.4 percent among those who felt a lot of respect down to 46.2 percent among those who felt none. The gap is large enough to matter for any budget conversation about appreciation events.

A lot of respect75.4%
Some respect64.8%
A little respect59.4%
Not at all46.2%
Volunteering retention by felt respect, MIDUS 3 wave. Source: PMC (MIDUS study)

Other research points the same way. A review of volunteer engagement literature lists recognition and symbolic rewards among the antecedents of satisfaction, and satisfaction is in turn tied to retention. Turnover is also a sector-wide concern: a National Volunteer Fire Council report found that over two-thirds of respondents felt their departments had a retention problem. For more on how satisfaction and retention connect, see our volunteer satisfaction report.

Awards and turnover: one program's data

Indiana research on a Scouting volunteer population offers a concrete comparison. In 2016, the study reported that 24 percent of volunteers received an award, and those volunteers had a lower turnover rate. The table summarizes the comparison. Treat it as one organization's data rather than a national benchmark.

Group (2016 data)Turnover rate
Volunteers who received an award6%
Volunteers who did not receive an award15%

The same study also found that training affected retention differently by gender, a reminder that one recognition approach will not fit every volunteer. The lesson for leaders is not that awards alone keep people, but that a visible, consistent thank-you system is measurable and worth tracking. Our character references and volunteer import tools can help you keep a clean roster so you can see who has served and who has been recognized.

What volunteers say they want

Preferences are clearer than many programs assume. In the Engage journal review of recognition studies, close to 70 percent of volunteers said they want to be thanked in person on an ongoing, informal basis. Meanwhile, 80 percent said they would like to hear the impact of their contributions. Yet over 80 percent of organizations named budget as their main barrier to recognition

VolunteerBadge

Ready to stop overpaying for background checks?

Full national criminal checks at $5. Free address history. FCRA compliant from day one. No monthly fees, no contracts.

Create Free Account

Legal Disclaimer: The content on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. VolunteerBadge and ScreenForge Labs, LLC are not law firms and do not provide legal counsel. FCRA requirements and applicable laws vary by jurisdiction and circumstances. For guidance specific to your organization, please consult a qualified attorney.

AI Content Transparency: We use AI tools to assist in the research and drafting of our blog content. That said, the opinions, perspectives, and editorial judgment in every article reflect the author's genuine views and real-world experience. We believe in full transparency about how content is created — because trust matters as much in publishing as it does in background screening.